SEN HR SUB GROUP 11th MEETING

Action

Minutes of last meeting – agreed. Issued to Liz Wilson for publication on website.

FSM

Matters arising

2.1

HM to discuss at recruitment and retention proposed initial ring fencing of vacancies to special schools in the run up to reorganisation. Also propose that retain all shortlisted applications (teaching and non-teaching), recent advert at Heaton Royd produced a very good field of candidates.

Feedback from Steering Group re variable implementation date

3.1

Positive and negative aspects reported back (see 4.2 of HR minutes 24 May 2004). Concerns also identified regarding cover and all age schools (particularly where there may be a phase change for pupils) and how gaps would be addressed.

3.2

Not all sub-groups had met and groups were asked to ensure they had consulted and report back to next steering group (23 July 04). Decision required by August to meet timescale for a 2006 implementation.

3.3

KF stated that concern about dates was causing staff to feel more unsettled, consequently some staff were leaving and recruitment and retention were priority issues.

3.4

School representatives to check views with all staff and report back to the next meeting

All

Feedback on staff consultation document

4.1

Concern was expressed re staff numbers quoted in the report, school reps will check and feedback changes.

All

4.2

Following lengthy discussion following key points were identified:

	Equality
	2 possible moves for some pupils/staff
	Sharing of resources for current and new schools
	Pupil numbers in new primary schools
	Honesty
	Delivery of proposed new/renovated buildings by 2006
	Staff changes in EB in SEN area
	View worst case scenario, eg 2008, therefore better able to manage and implement early if ready. In retaining planning for 2006 if it is delayed there is significant potential for staff to feel anxious due to a lack of clarity (some already do), this can lead to increased levels of stress, possible lengthy sickness absences and/or higher levels of staff turnover. Consequently a plea was made for a planning/implementation cycle that was achievable and rooted in reality.

4.3

Issues reported back to Steering Group from the staff

	655 forms distributed, 379 responses
	broad indications that staff want to remain with the same age range although there may be a move towards the primary phase.
	Travelling time important for both teaching and non-teaching.
	Generally, no strong preference for or against any particular school.
	Some staff had indicated they would wish to retire subject to an (their wording) “appealing” or “suitable” package being available.

4.4

H/T’s to check employee figures and feedback on further analysis required on the consultation report.

4.5

Put consultation report on website when employee numbers have been verified/corrected as appropriate.

4.6

Ensure thanks put in next communication bulletin for everyone’s contribution to and participation in the consultation exercise.

Next meeting 14 July 2004, 1300 hours, Room 3, floor 7, City Exchange.

SEN HR SUB GROUP 11th MEETING

23 JUNE 2004